Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

So whether you need a 30-round PMAG<\/a>, a 33-round Glock mag, or anything previously restricted, Brownells now offers its entire inventory of high-capacity magazines once again to California residents. For more information on AR-15, AK-47 and other commonly-owned semi-auto rifle and pistol magazines, please visit brownells.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Brownells Sales of Standard-Capacity Magazines to California Put on Hold","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/17\/brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":11152,"post_author":"351","post_date":"2020-08-14 14:25:10","post_date_gmt":"2020-08-14 18:25:10","post_content":"\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

\u201cCalifornia\u2019s near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today\u2019s post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\u201d wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So whether you need a 30-round PMAG<\/a>, a 33-round Glock mag, or anything previously restricted, Brownells now offers its entire inventory of high-capacity magazines once again to California residents. For more information on AR-15, AK-47 and other commonly-owned semi-auto rifle and pistol magazines, please visit brownells.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Brownells Sales of Standard-Capacity Magazines to California Put on Hold","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/17\/brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":11152,"post_author":"351","post_date":"2020-08-14 14:25:10","post_date_gmt":"2020-08-14 18:25:10","post_content":"\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

Either way, since the historic ruling in Duncan v Becerra<\/em> called the ban an infringement on people's ability to practice self-defense, the gold rush is on. Brownells resumed selling its full lineup of rifle, pistol and shotgun magazines to all Cali customers. So don't sleep on it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCalifornia\u2019s near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today\u2019s post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\u201d wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So whether you need a 30-round PMAG<\/a>, a 33-round Glock mag, or anything previously restricted, Brownells now offers its entire inventory of high-capacity magazines once again to California residents. For more information on AR-15, AK-47 and other commonly-owned semi-auto rifle and pistol magazines, please visit brownells.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Brownells Sales of Standard-Capacity Magazines to California Put on Hold","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/17\/brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":11152,"post_author":"351","post_date":"2020-08-14 14:25:10","post_date_gmt":"2020-08-14 18:25:10","post_content":"\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

Of course, we're all talking about the same thing here. We in the firearm industry like to call 30-round mags and below standard. Cause, well, that's what they are. Meanwhile, in terms of gun control and most regulations out there, 10 rounds and above become \"high-capacity\" in public parlance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Either way, since the historic ruling in Duncan v Becerra<\/em> called the ban an infringement on people's ability to practice self-defense, the gold rush is on. Brownells resumed selling its full lineup of rifle, pistol and shotgun magazines to all Cali customers. So don't sleep on it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCalifornia\u2019s near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today\u2019s post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\u201d wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So whether you need a 30-round PMAG<\/a>, a 33-round Glock mag, or anything previously restricted, Brownells now offers its entire inventory of high-capacity magazines once again to California residents. For more information on AR-15, AK-47 and other commonly-owned semi-auto rifle and pistol magazines, please visit brownells.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Brownells Sales of Standard-Capacity Magazines to California Put on Hold","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/17\/brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":11152,"post_author":"351","post_date":"2020-08-14 14:25:10","post_date_gmt":"2020-08-14 18:25:10","post_content":"\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

Brownells Resumes High-Capacity Magazines to California<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, we're all talking about the same thing here. We in the firearm industry like to call 30-round mags and below standard. Cause, well, that's what they are. Meanwhile, in terms of gun control and most regulations out there, 10 rounds and above become \"high-capacity\" in public parlance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Either way, since the historic ruling in Duncan v Becerra<\/em> called the ban an infringement on people's ability to practice self-defense, the gold rush is on. Brownells resumed selling its full lineup of rifle, pistol and shotgun magazines to all Cali customers. So don't sleep on it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCalifornia\u2019s near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today\u2019s post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\u201d wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So whether you need a 30-round PMAG<\/a>, a 33-round Glock mag, or anything previously restricted, Brownells now offers its entire inventory of high-capacity magazines once again to California residents. For more information on AR-15, AK-47 and other commonly-owned semi-auto rifle and pistol magazines, please visit brownells.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Brownells Sales of Standard-Capacity Magazines to California Put on Hold","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/17\/brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":11152,"post_author":"351","post_date":"2020-08-14 14:25:10","post_date_gmt":"2020-08-14 18:25:10","post_content":"\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

Well, that didn't take long at all. Brownells just announced it resumed selling standard-capacity magazines to California residents, following the recent big win in court. California's 9th Circuit court ruled Friday<\/a> that a previous ban on \"high-capacity\" magazines\u2014what most of us consider standard capacity\u2014was unconstitutional. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Brownells Resumes High-Capacity Magazines to California<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, we're all talking about the same thing here. We in the firearm industry like to call 30-round mags and below standard. Cause, well, that's what they are. Meanwhile, in terms of gun control and most regulations out there, 10 rounds and above become \"high-capacity\" in public parlance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Either way, since the historic ruling in Duncan v Becerra<\/em> called the ban an infringement on people's ability to practice self-defense, the gold rush is on. Brownells resumed selling its full lineup of rifle, pistol and shotgun magazines to all Cali customers. So don't sleep on it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCalifornia\u2019s near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today\u2019s post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\u201d wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So whether you need a 30-round PMAG<\/a>, a 33-round Glock mag, or anything previously restricted, Brownells now offers its entire inventory of high-capacity magazines once again to California residents. For more information on AR-15, AK-47 and other commonly-owned semi-auto rifle and pistol magazines, please visit brownells.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Brownells Sales of Standard-Capacity Magazines to California Put on Hold","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/17\/brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":11152,"post_author":"351","post_date":"2020-08-14 14:25:10","post_date_gmt":"2020-08-14 18:25:10","post_content":"\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n

ORIGINAL STORY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Well, that didn't take long at all. Brownells just announced it resumed selling standard-capacity magazines to California residents, following the recent big win in court. California's 9th Circuit court ruled Friday<\/a> that a previous ban on \"high-capacity\" magazines\u2014what most of us consider standard capacity\u2014was unconstitutional. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Brownells Resumes High-Capacity Magazines to California<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Of course, we're all talking about the same thing here. We in the firearm industry like to call 30-round mags and below standard. Cause, well, that's what they are. Meanwhile, in terms of gun control and most regulations out there, 10 rounds and above become \"high-capacity\" in public parlance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Either way, since the historic ruling in Duncan v Becerra<\/em> called the ban an infringement on people's ability to practice self-defense, the gold rush is on. Brownells resumed selling its full lineup of rifle, pistol and shotgun magazines to all Cali customers. So don't sleep on it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCalifornia\u2019s near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today\u2019s post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\u201d wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So whether you need a 30-round PMAG<\/a>, a 33-round Glock mag, or anything previously restricted, Brownells now offers its entire inventory of high-capacity magazines once again to California residents. For more information on AR-15, AK-47 and other commonly-owned semi-auto rifle and pistol magazines, please visit brownells.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n","post_title":"Brownells Sales of Standard-Capacity Magazines to California Put on Hold","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 16:13:59","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/17\/brownells-high-capacity-magazines-cali\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"},{"ID":11152,"post_author":"351","post_date":"2020-08-14 14:25:10","post_date_gmt":"2020-08-14 18:25:10","post_content":"\n

In a resounding win for West Coast gun owners, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court threw out the California high-capacity magazine ban Friday, calling it unconstitutional. A three-judge panel said the rule violates Americans' right to bear arms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Judges Rule California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld an earlier decision by U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez in Duncan v Becerra<\/em><\/a>. That decision ruled California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violated the Second Amendment. The National Shooting Sports Federation, NSSF, among others, also submitted an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a tremendous victory for all who value the rule of law and preservation of individual liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution,\u201d said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President of General Counsel. \u201cThe firearm industry trade association was confident that possession of these accessories is protected by the Second Amendment and that California overreached to infringe upon the fundamental civil liberties of law-abiding citizens. This serves as notice to antigun politicians that their campaign to trample on constitutional rights and advance a radical agenda to deny citizens\u2019 their Second Amendment rights will not go unchallenged.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's near-categorical ban of LCMs strikes at the core of the Second Amendment \u2014 the right to armed self-defense. Armed self-defense is a fundamental right rooted in tradition and the text of the Second Amendment. Indeed, from pre-colonial times to today's post-modern era, the right to defend hearth and home has remained paramount,\" wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"California's law imposes a substantial burden on this right to self-defense,\" Lee continued. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving Forward<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The ruling obviously represents a big step for California as far as gun rights are concerned. The Associated Press<\/em> reported<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it \u201ca huge victory\u201d for gun owners \u201cand the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court\u2019s jurisdiction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

California AG Xavier Becerra didn't confirm whether he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling, reported nbcnewyork.com<\/a>. However, industry experts expect continuing litigation to keep the California high-capacity magazine ban legally considered unconstitutional. <\/p>\n","post_title":"9th Circuit Rules California High-Capacity Magazine Ban Unconstitutional","post_excerpt":"","post_status":"publish","comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","post_password":"","post_name":"california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional","to_ping":"","pinged":"","post_modified":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_modified_gmt":"2023-05-31 10:33:13","post_content_filtered":"","post_parent":0,"guid":"https:\/\/www.dev.athlonoutdoors.com\/2020\/08\/14\/california-high-magazine-ban-unconstitutional\/","menu_order":0,"post_type":"post","post_mime_type":"","comment_count":"0","filter":"raw"}],"next":false,"prev":false,"total_page":1},"paged":1,"column_class":"jeg_col_2o3","class":"jnews_block_23"};

POPULAR

No Content Available

BROWSE BY BRAND

\n